Welcome to The Rebirth of WE the People

June 17, 2009

by Dahni

© Copyright 6/17/09

all rights reserved

As the banner of this blog reads, this is for background and a repository of concepts and ideas, for a new political movement, The American Eagle Service.
This is #3 of 7 blogs all associated with each other. Click on the links below or from the right sidebar to visit these blogs. Links are highlighted as you scroll over them with your mouse or are seen in the highlighted text of their appropriate URL or address.
#1 of 7 blogs Our Lady Liberty to Illuminate provide information, history, resources and the initial tools WE need
#2 of 7 is An American Eagle to Inspire – tell a story about a story that comes true
#3 of 7 is The American Eagle Service (You are Here) The American Eagle Service is to Initiate take action and make a story come true
#4 of 7 is American Eagle News to Inform – provide news and announcements concerning WE the people
#5 of 7 is American Eagle Store to Invest – purchase stuff and to contribute to, WE the People
#6 of 7 is 1 of WE Project to Incubate – a national project to encourage and nurture our wee little 1’s of WE  🙂
#7 of 7 is Call to RESET to Impress – podcasts to impress upon us each to RESET our Republic
With this first post, I would like to lay before you, some initial background information. This idea grew out of my own frustrations with the political process in our country. I am not a member of any political party, unless you want to count the independents, but I don’t think such a party with that name exists. I am 55 years of youth and in all my voting years, I have never been invited to any party. 😦
Well that’s OK, I’d rather serve anyway. So I am having a service, The American Eagle Service. Maybe you have never been invited to a party like me, so I’m inviting you to serve! 🙂
It does not matter if you are some independent like me, a Democrat, a Republican or are part of some other party. All that matters is that you want to come and are willing to BYOB, (bring your own brains). I am trying to be lighthearted here, but I am really serious! To get the background on this whole idea, please visit one of my other blogs at wordpress. The title of the post is, ‘The American Eagle Party.’ It was written 8/1/08. Please take a look; give it a read and then return to this blog. Here is the link:
There are six blogs (including this one), which are associated with each other and all are powered by WordPress.com They are as follows and should be viewed in the order shown.
1. Our Lady Liberty – “How’s She Doing”
This blog is to hopefully Illuminate anyone interested, with history, information, trivia and resources about this experiment called, the United States of America. To know where we are going or desire to go, we need to understand where we have been. This is to provide the initial tools WE need to build OUR service. Background information, American History, quotes from OUR founding fathers and others that have contributed to this U.S.A. experiment, and even OUR founding documents (links), are what you can expect to find there. Illuminate!
2. An American Eagle – “When I-Magination Becomes Real”
This blog will hopefully Inspire and tell a story about The American Eagle Service becoming a reality. This is a fictional work in progress by me, shared on line. It is the story of a writer, Benjamin Thomas Silent (Ben Silent), that imagines what it would be like to see the U.S.A. return to its greatness. He shares many of his stories with his only one true friend, Kahlil Abrams. Kahlil is named after Kahlil Gibran and his mother is Muslim and his father Jewish. Conversations between Ben and Kahlil are carried on long distance over the phone. Kahlil is a successful business man living in California and Ben is a small town, homegrown Midwest man. They met in high school, became fast friends and have maintained their close relationship through their years. Each week Kahlil calls Ben and asks just one question, “what have you written?” As Ben begins to write, ‘An American Eagle,’ his friend encourages him to put it on line in a blog. Soon, the blog begins to take on a life of its own, and The American Eagle Service becomes a reality. But not before the powers that be, chase him across the country and try to stop him by any means! Inspire!
3. The American Eagle Service – You’re here
The American Eagle Service – Background and a repository, for the development of a new restoration service. This blog is to Initiate! It is for servants to post, ask, suggest, help, encourage and in general, to SERVE!!! Too many have been silent for too long, not believing that they have a voice or if their voice was heard that it would not matter anyway. Too many feel as if their representatives in government, do not and will not listen to the will of WE the people. Too many are afraid of losing our country, our rights and our freedoms – our LIBERTY! Too many are angry. Too many blame others and not a few, turn to violence. Too many people think we have no other choice than to hope things change. Too many have lost confidence in the media and in the dominant two-party political system. Too many of US are divided! I believe there are many and in sufficient numbers that would believe and would act and serve IF, WE had the power and a vehicle to make it happen. When WE truly get together, WE can change the course of our country; our lives and our futures and the futures of our children’s children and theirs and theirs and theirs and onward! Initiate
#4 of 6 is American Eagle News to Inform – provide news and announcements concerning WE the people
#5 of 6 is American Eagle Store to Invest – purchase stuff and to contribute to, WE the People – New Designs Now Available
#6 of 6 is 1 of WE Project to Incubate – a national project to encourage and nurture our wee little 1’s of WE  🙂
#7 of 7 is Call to RESET to Impress – podcasts to impress upon us each to RESET our Republic
The next post to this blog will be an introduction to 8 principle ideas of how to take back control of our country. Each of 7 present ideas (most of which are already being tried), will be shared individually here in the future. Then finally, another future post will show why it is ONLY #8 (a new political service), which can truly be successful IF, WE the People, will act. Initiate!
Introduction click here

1 of WE,

an Amer-I-Can Eagle


Next Post Why The American Eagle is the Only Option?
Previous Post – Welcome and Introduction

The Durham Report

May 16, 2023

short url to this post: https://wp.me/pGfx1-QN

The Durham Report

By Dahni
© 2023, all rights reserved

   The Durham Report, aka – The origins of the investigation into ties between Russia and the 2016 Trump presidential campaign.


 To my knowledge, this was released first to the current Attorney General (per protocol), on Friday, May 12th, 2023. It sat over the weekend and was released to the public on 5/15/2023.

   This report took over three years to complete. I repeat for emphasis, “over three years to complete.” It cost the taxpayers millions of dollars. One report said it cost just in its first year $3.8 million. Another report (The Washington Post) said:

“The special counsel appointed to review the FBI’s investigation of the 2016 Trump campaign has so far cost taxpayers more than $6.5 million, according to a Justice Department report released Friday. … The special counsel’s work appears to be winding down, but the Justice Department has not yet announced when it will end.”

The Washington Post

   The quote above was from before the release of the Durham Report and no matter what the final bill will be, I stand by what I wrote, it has and will cost the US American Taxpayers, “millions of dollars!” But what is in it?

   Perhaps it should be renamed? How about Bull Durham or Durham’s Bull? In my opinion (common sense not a legal opinion), it is just 306 pages of BS, Bull or Durham’s Bull.

   I have a PDF copy of this document. Read it yourself if you like. Here’s a link to read and/or download it for FREE.


   Maybe you will conclude as I have? What follows is my take:

1. The origins of the investigation into ties between Russia and the 2016 Trump presidential campaign – Are solely based on false, misleading and often intentional – fake news. President Trump was right all along, it was nothing more than a “hoax!”
2. A considerable amount of time (after 1 above), is spent discussing law, rules and regulations of the Department of Justice (DOJ), and how the FBI, CIA and other intelligence or information gathering agencies are supposed to instigate and conduct investigations.
3. It spends a great deal of time of reasons to prosecute crimes or not (most often as “not” there is “not” enough evidence that would lead to conviction. Question: When should wrong ever get a pass from doing the right thing?
4. The report spends a great amount of time splaining’ (explaining), “Confirmation Bias.” Question: Why should anyone not be arrested for failing to do their job, follow investigative procedures and policies, and the law (and many have sworn oaths), just because they had “Confirmation bias” ? This is more, a lot more than just doing something one is told to do without questioning. This is one just not doing their job to follow the evidence because, they already believe the evidence exists even though they have none whatsoever.
5. Even mentioning the source of Durham’s Bull made me remember Hillary Clinton and the Clinton campaign — no arrests, indictments or investigations into the perpetrators of this hoax are recommended by Durham’s 306 pages of Bull.
6. Durham’s Bull concludes with just recommendations how all investigations under the executive branch of government should be conducted in the future. These amount to nothing more than doing what the government has known for decades, how to do! Durham’s opinions are that, despite his title and education, just opinions. Well, I have opinions too. Every person, organization, agency, and etc. that knowingly participated in this hoax should be arrested. As defined in Durham’s Bull,’ those that participated in “Confirmation bias” are guilty of failure to their job, follow procedures and policies. Each should be held accountable, according to the severity of their willing participation:

a. If they are still employed by the government they should be at least fired and not able to work in the government or in public trust in the future.
b. All security clearances should be revoked and they should never be allowed any security clearance in the future nor immediately and forever, be allowed to receive in any manner, any security briefings or information of national security or investigations or private matters of the United States of America.
c. Arrests should be made of all those that have either participated in the orchestrating of this hoax or its dissemination. Each should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, regardless of whether enough evidence or probable cause is sufficient. There is more than sufficient evidence to convict on perjury or multiple perjuries in and of themselves.
d. Many that have willingly participated in this hoax are attorneys and should have their licenses revoked.
e. Some of the highest ranking individuals in this hoax should be arrested and tried for treason.
f. Media outlets that have participated in this hoax should at least apologize for colluding with the perpetrators of this hoax and that actively participated with it, should be held financially accountable and forward the amounts (at least the amount), of the Durham Report expenses, to the US Treasury.
g. The US government and the media, which participated with the government in this hoax, should make restitution to every person that was wrongfully targeted by this hoax.
h. At least a formal and public apology from the United States to Russia should be made to Russia for accusing them of this whole perpetration of a hoax.

   There can be no doubt that this hoax affected not only the Trump presidency and everyone directly or indirectly with the US during his presidency from 2016-2020, it also affected the presidential election of 2020 and even continues to do so today. Because of perceived wrongdoing and “confirmation bias” that has spread to the public like a plague, it has produced lawsuits — criminal and civil, which are influentially tainted because of, this hoax.

   There is in law, a legal precedent and a legal metaphor for how to handle “tainted” evidence or lack thereof (this hoax). It is called – “Fruit of the poisonous tree.”


   “Fruit of the poisonous tree” is a legal metaphor used to describe evidence that is obtained illegally. The logic of the terminology is that if the source (the “tree”) of the evidence or evidence itself is tainted, then anything gained (the “fruit”) from it is tainted as well.


   “Fruit of the poisonous tree” (FOTPT), even has its own ‘Doctrine, which is an extension of the ‘exclusionary rule.’ The exclusionary rule is a legal rule, based on constitutional law, that prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights. It is grounded in the fourth amendment –

Fourth Amendment

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”


   “Fruit of the poisonous tree” (FOTPT), has four main exceptions to admitting tainted evidence:

1. it was discovered in part as a result of an independent, untainted source
2. it would inevitably have been discovered despite the tainted source
3. the chain of causation between the illegal action and the tainted evidence is too attenuated [weak]
4. the search warrant was not found to be valid based on probable cause, but was executed by government agents in good faith (called the good-faith exception).


   OK, lets look at numbers 1-3 of the “Fruit of the poisonous tree” (FOTPT), doctrine in allowing tainted evidence of Durham’s Bull or the hoax.

   Was it discovered in part of an independent untainted source? No, it was known that there was no evidence to this and it was a hoax. It was tainted!

   Would it have been discovered, despite it being tainted? Absolutely not, and it was known there was no evidence, that it was tainted and it was a hoax.

   Was there a chain of causation between [any] illegal action and the tainted evidence too attenuated [weak]? There was no chain of cause. There was no evidence. It was all made up [a hoax] and it was all, therefore – tainted!

   Lastly, what about search warrants and specifically those ordered by the secret FISA Court – The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), also called the FISA Court? Did government agents in good faith, execute these applications for warrants? What is the definition of “good faith”?

Good Faith Exception

Evidence collected in violation of privacy rights as interpreted from the Fourth Amendment, can be admitted at trial [or as in the execution of a search warrant(s)], if police officers [and other government agents – local, state or federal], acting in good faith (bona fides), rely upon a defective search warrant — that is, they had reason to believe their actions were legal (measured under the reasonable person test).

   Well, how about that last long-winded and legalese definition? It being number four of the exceptions in allowing tainted evidence in the doctrine to the “Fruit of the poisonous tree” (FOTPT), does it pass the smell and rotten test? OMG no! The good faith exception does not apply. It is perhaps above all the others, the stinkiest and rottenest fruit of the poisonous tree! Every person that submitted these applications to the FISA Court for a warrant or a renewal knew it was based on insufficient evidence. “In sufficient evidence” is just a nice way of saying there was no evidence! It was “tainted!” It was a hoax.

   Despite standards, rules, regulations and law, every person that sought renewal of these warrants, never spent the required amount of time (about 45 days), to re-investigate or to confirm their reasons for the warrant were valid to renew them.

   So what does this all mean? What should it all mean? It should mean that it should have never happened in the first place and the courts should view it as having never happened as it is all tainted and there are no exceptions to have ever allowed this hoax to have been brought! It also means that no other case (criminal or civil), that has come from this “poisonous tree” should have ever been brought. It should also mean that despite cases having been brought, are pending, in place or may be in the future, “the fruit of the poisonous tree” should all be dismissed as if, they were never brought!

   I am not going to opine here about the presidential election of 2020. Neither will I commit to whether or not any indictment, charges or lawsuits brought, ongoing or pending were or are exceptions to the rules or the statue of limitations is re-interpreted or that evidence cannot even substantiate the year or there is no clear jurisdiction to try the case exists. All I am saying here is, it is more than abundantly clear that these are all — “fruit of the poisonous tree” and are “tainted.”

   So now, what to do with this information? How is anyone held accountable for any of this? Many have been involved and for years, in the accusations of a few, now understood as innocent as charged. The character of people under duress has long been understood. Perhaps you have heard the following or something similar –

“When the going gets rough, the tough get going!”

  The earliest occurrence that I have found is from ‘Thomas Won’t Let Hornets Scrimmage, in the column Good Evening, by Joe Scherrer, published in The Corpus Christi Times (Corpus Christi, Texas) of Tuesday 15th September 1953—the Green Hornets were a football team.

   Well, when it gets rough, the tough get going is one way of looking at one’s character. It can be simplified as just – doing the right thing. Our grandmother when we three children were growing up, always insisted on us always telling the truth. She did not want us to hide the truth, deny the truth, avoid the truth, or keep the truth from her. This is also part of character. Yes, human nature wants to avoid being caught or getting into trouble. We would not have this in the first place if, we would always do the right thing and tell the truth.

“Rumour the swiftest of all evils. Speed lends her strength, and she wins vigour as she goes; small at first through fear, soon she mounts up to heaven, and walks the ground with head hidden in the clouds.”

Excepts from a poem ‘the Aeneid’ book IV starting around line 173, by Virgil between 29 and 19 BC

   How about this –

“If you want truth to go round the world you must hire an express train to pull it; but if you want a lie to
go round the world, it will fly; it is as light as a feather, and a breath will carry it. It is well said in the old Proverb, ‘A lie will go round the world while truth is pulling its boots on.’

C. H. Spurgeon, 1859

     So, whoever first coined the line ‘A lie will go round the world while truth is pulling its boots,’ it was not likely Mark Twain, Oscar Wilde or Winston Churchill. It has always been difficult to find who said what. This is part of the problem.

   Acceptability or what is acceptable? Do you remember the tag-team, husband and wife, former president and secretary of state, their responses –

“It depends on what is, is.” –

“It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the—if he—if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement. … Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true.”

President William Jefferson Clinton

What difference at this point does it make?” –

“With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?”

Former Secretary of State, Hilary Rodham Clinton

  I remember the days of yes are yes and no meant no; when language was clear and what was said was what was meant. We are a long time a way from those days, the good ol’ days of the specks of the unimportant past? What about today? So what if this whole thing was a hoax? So what if it wasted millions of taxpayer dollars? And so what or how many lives, innocent lives were destroyed or are still being destroyed? No one is going to be held accountable. What’s done is done and like HRC said –

“What difference at this point does it make?”

  It’s all in the past now. So what? The past is past and not the present reality? We must be progressive and liberal and woke in the new social order of things?

   James Madison wrote that our Constitution requires “sufficient virtue among men for self-government,” otherwise, “nothing less than the chains of despotism can restrain them from destroying and devouring one another.”

On August 18, 1790, President George Washington wrote a letter to the Hebrew Congregation in Newport, RI –

“All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. … For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.”

George Washington

“WE the People also know that we indeed hold self-evident truths. And we know that government, lawyers and judges are not the creators of our rights. Our Creator endowed those rights to We the People. Our Constitution recognizes this, restraining the power of the federal government and preserving the liberty of the people.”

Excerpts from an article August 3rd, 2020 by Mark D. Martin, Dean, School of Law
Bradley J. Lingo, Executive Director, Robertson Center for Constitutional Law
Michael Schietzelt, Senior Fellow, Robertson Center for Constitutional Law

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

John Adams

   Our founding documents (the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the United States for America), and our founders simply understood and wrote as if in stone with an iron pen, the remedy for whom ever or whatever trampled upon our rights and the governmental abuse of power.

“…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

Except from: The Declaration of Independence

   It is apparent that WE the People have neither awakened to the necessity of the above quote nor awakened enough to challenge the servants of OUR government, to do the right thing and to be held accountable.

   So then what? The tendency first is to hide bad behavior. Then if confronted, deny it. If confronted with the undeniable truth, blame others. If the pressure to be held accountable is unrelenting, collude with others to lie about it and blame others, or don’t mention it at all or tell someone that their sins are worse. Once that is done, if still exposed by the light of truth, maybe there is a non-verbalized and unwritten admission of guilt under “confirmation bias?” In other words, OK, we did it, but for good reasons? Now what?

   It is my belief that when people are no longer conscientious about good behavior, doing the right thing and are morally bankrupt, with neither compass nor rudder to navigate the sea of confusion, fear will move them to be bribed or extorted in their words and deeds. That is all “confirmation bias” is, as well. And when it reaches this depth of apathy, moral decay, hubris or arrogance, there becomes nothing less for these vacant souls to say than what my brother personally experienced with the “So What” crowd –

“What are you going to do about it?”

   Yes, that is the arrogance of these people who have no fear whatsoever of ever being held accountable. They look out for one another. They stand together.

   If you or I are waiting on the current president of 2023 or the next president from 2024-2028 to clean house from the top down of all these unelected bureaucrats, it is likely too deep and there are too many people that are too entrenched and hidden, for far too long, for any one person to do much if anything about it. So alas, the hoax (lies), spread for even a little while was successful. It produced the results they sought, to hold their power no matter what, even at the expense of We the People. There can hardly be one single individual in all of the USA that on some level believed or had their doubts about President Donald J. Trump being in collusion with Russia. This hoax (the lies), has, I am certain, negatively affected him personally, in many ways. That’s the “fruit from the poisonous tree!”

   WE the People are either going to wake up, rise up, take a stand on our unalienable rights together or not. Either WE will continue this 200 + year experiment of a republic and self-rule or wave it a fond goodbye (if WE are awake to see it leave). WE will either stand and commit to these “self evident” truths under the banner of our being created equally and all having these unalienable rights, or sell our souls to the fear and corruption of bribery and extortion. Then this will all end not with a bang or a whimper, but the sound of thumb sucking by mostly adults that are not much more than petulant, unruly, spoiled and undisciplined children with soiled diapers. I am not sure it would be necessary to invade us by force or that anything other than the geography and natural resources would interest another nation. I am not sure of that. But I am sure of this –

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Preamble to the Constitution of the United States for America

   WE need to RESET our Republic! Only WE the People can do this, not the Executive, Legislative or Judiciary branches of government, only US, WE the People! How? See:


1of WE,

The Costs to Be a Patriot

April 27, 2023

short url to this post: https://wp.me/pGfx1-Qu

The Costs to Be a Patriot

By Dahni
© 2022, all rights reserved

“In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.”

-Mark Twain-


1of WE,

It’s Now Way Past Time

April 26, 2023

short url to this post: https://wp.me/pGfx1-Qn

It’s Now Way Past Time

By Dahni
© 2022, all rights reserved

“It is now way past time for WE the People to awake from sleep and stupor. Never in our history has so many been controlled by threats and bribes by so few. It is not freedom that gives all that we may want, but does not inlude the freedom to do what is right!”



1of WE,

A Good Quote

September 27, 2022

short url to this post: https://wp.me/pGfx1-Q6

A Good Quote

By Dahni
© 2022, all rights reserved


WE the People

How often have we needed or looked for some suitable or appropriate quote or quotes to our posts and writings? Speaking of “appropriate” or apropos, why not quote ourselves?  Yes, why can’t we make up our own lines, quote ourselves or have them worthy of being quoted by others.

I used to marvel at those that were famous, quick-witted and able to succinctly and clearly form words so fitting for any occasion. Why not you and I?


Use this image with text or white out the text and put in your own quotable quote


Use this image with text or white out the text and put in your own quotable quote

1 of WE,

Acts and Actions—Part 3

February 18, 2021

short url to this post: https://wp.me/pGfx1-Oi

Acts and Actions—Part 3

By Dahni
© 2021, all rights reserved

The red ball is an act which leads to actions

Acts and Actions—Part 3
(Early acts and actions)

   The Magna Carta— Latin: Magna Carta Libertatum (Medieval Latin for “Great Charter of Freedoms”), commonly called Magna Carta (also Magna Charta; “Great Charter”), is a royal charter of rights agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on 15 June 1215. This was revised several times since and by several kings. What is most important to remember about this, is that not even the king or his successors were supposed to break it! The king and his successors were supposed to be bound to it. When it came to the times of the Revolutionary War, though not by name, it was alluded to in the Declaration of Independence, published July 4th, 1776. In this affidavit (a legal document), the colonists/patriots laid out their case against then King George, for having broken laws that not even the king was allowed to do. They built their case and presented it to the world court of public opinion with its several “therefore(s)” and concluded with the “whereas” that they should be, “free and independent states”.

   But before this time, what we know as the U.S.A. today was land owned (claimed and controlled), by the Dutch, England, France and Spain, mostly. Virginia was the first colony founded by the English, in a joint venture known as the Virginia Company, along the James River, on May 14, 1607. But to do so, they had to have a charter from the king. The English King at this time was, King James, the same King that authorized the King James Version of the Bible in 1611. But throughout it’s early history, Virginia received three (3), charters.

   “Virginia received three charters, one in 1606, another in 1609, and the third in 1612. The differences among the three charters lie primarily in the territorial jurisdiction of the company, not in the right to govern the colony. In 1609, the “sea to sea” provision was inserted, and in 1612 jurisdiction was extended eastward from the Virginia shores to include islands, such as Bermuda, in the Atlantic.”

“From the outset the Virginia Company was granted the authority to govern its own colony. A ruling council in England, composed of members of the joint-stock company who were usually merchants of great distinction, was formed immediately after King James I granted the charter of 1606. The councillors were appointed ostensibly by the king, but in reality were nominated by the membership, or more often, by the inner executive group of the company. The council in England issued instructions to the first settlers appointing a colonial council to make daily decisions. This group proved ineftective, and a governor, Lord Delaware, was eventually appointed. Acting under the council in England, the governor had absolute power. The authority to establish or alter a government in Virginia was based upon the charter granted by the king; in this sense, the king delegated some of his power to others.”

From: The Second Virginia Charter 1609 – Introduction

“We, greatlie affectinge the effectual prosecucion and happie successe of the said plantacion and comendinge their good desires theirin, for their further encouragement in accomplishinge so excellent a worke, much pleasinge to God and profitable to oure Kingdomes, doe, of oure speciall grace and certeine knowledge and meere motion, for us, oure heires and successors, give, graunt and confirme to oure trustie and welbeloved subjects…”

Excerpt from: The Second Virginia Charter (May 23, 1609)

   Please re-read the quoted texts above. Pay particular attention to the italicized, bold text where words are highlighted in another color, other than black. The “sea to sea” (like from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean – east coast to west coast), “The authority to establish or alter a government in Virginia”, “as based upon the charter granted by the king”, and to his/their “heires [heirs] and successors.”

   “Heirs and Successors” sounds like perpetuity or a continuance without end. Because of this, there are those today which believe that the United States is still under rule by the present monarch, Queen Elizabeth of England and the British Empire. Therefore, to remove this undoing, we must sever our ties?

   We need to understand the words “divine right.” Monarchs believed or still believe their absolute authority (“divine rights”), have been granted by God for them to rule. Let me now here blow a huge hole in that argument. These charters began with King James and would extend to all his “heirs and successors”. This same king of with his so-called “divine right”, is the same king whose God was the God of the Bible, and the same king who authorized the King James Version of 1611. But this same God never wanted a king for His people in the first place! God told his people that a king would take their wives, their children, them, and all of their property. The people persisted. God relented and in order to save some and not to overturn freedom of will, God allowed them to have a king. And the first king of Israel, what did he do? He took all their wives, children, the people and all their property, was caught disobeying God, never asked God for forgiveness, blamed everyone and anything other than take responsibility for his own actions, and went insane and committed suicide. “Divine Right”? Not even close! But let’s say we were bought and sold way back in 1609. One if not two more things should end this bogus or false theory for anyone that has at least one more brain cell than a single celled ameba!

   In 1776, our formers published the Declaration of Independence with the reasons for separating from England to be come free and Independent States. WE won!

   Peace negotiations began in Paris in April 1782 and continued through the summer. Representing the United States were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, Henry Laurens, and John Adams. David Hartley and Richard Oswald represented Great Britain. The treaty was drafted on November 30, 1782, and signed in Paris on September 3, 1783, by Adams, Franklin, Jay, and Hartley.

   Demanded by the patriots and accepted by the king through his agents, the first of several key points of this treaty was:

1. Britain acknowledges the United States (New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia to be free, sovereign, and independent states, and that the British Crown and all heirs and successors relinquish claims to the Government, property, and territorial rights of the same, and every part thereof,…

Excerpt from: The Paris Peace Treaty September 3, 1783

   Did you catch those italicized, bold and other colored words? All the claims of the British Crown and all their heirs and successors were relinquished! Even though most of the treaty was broken over time, this first point in the treaty was never broken! But if this is not enough to blow this argument up that WE are still under the abeyance of England, here is the last point.

   The colonies, after publishing the Declaration of Independence in 1776 had a civil government. It was called the Continental Congress. Between July 1776 and November 1777 after much debate, there was an agreement among the 13 original states for the United States of America. On November 15, 1777, the Second Continental Congress approved of and sent something to the states for ratification. It was ratified by the states and came into force March 1st, 1781. This was our first constitution. Perhaps you know this by its shortened name, ‘The Articles of Confederation? Do you know its full name?

   Our first constitution was called— The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union. WOW, there’s that word “perpetual”. Does not this mean a continuance, goes on and on forever, and does not end and etc.? Yes. Well, I suppose that some may argue that because of this word “perpetual” and combining it with the “heirs and successors” of King James charters since 1609, we really are still under the control of England in perpetuity (forever)? Well, there is a problem with this logic, a huge problem. It is called— the Constitution for the United States of America. It was ratified by all the states in 1789.

   One could view the canceling of our first constitution and replacing it with our second as: with the coming of the greater, the lesser terminated. Yes, the former was cancelled by the institution of, the agreement (ratification), by all the states (it was unanimous), and by its recognition by all as— “The Law of the Land!” One way to look at this, the new, is that all former agreements ended or like the announcement of a bookie that bets can no longer be accepted because, the race is about to be begin and, “all bets are off!” 🙂

   And by the way, the word “perpetual” is missing from the Constitution for the United States of America. In its preamble its opening salvo reads— “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union…” It neither says perpetual nor the forming of a perfect, Union. It does not mean more perfect than perfect which is illogical, but one that is more perfect (better than), the former Union. It is a figure of speech. It is figurative language, which shows the intent to seek towards excellence. It is a goal. This is all it is. Could it be lost? Yes. Has it continued as the oldest surviving republic this year, for 232 years? Yes or perhaps? Yes? Yes, because this document is still here, still considered or supposed to be considered as, “the law of the land!” It is government de jure (pure law). But “perhaps” (perhaps not), what do I mean by “perhaps”?

   Prior to 2021, the Capitol (the building), underwent some much needed cleaning and repair. Had you or I been in Washington, D.C. during this time and within eyesight of the capitol, we would have seen scaffolding all around for the construction/reconstruction workers to perform the needed cleaning and repair. They did their work and the scaffolding has been removed. But just suppose that this scaffolding, hiding in plain sight, they had actually torn down the whole thing and replaced it with something new, but it still looked identical to the original? If we found out about it, wouldn’t we be upset? Would not we be angry about it? Wouldn’t we peaceably (protest), our government with our grievances? I would and I’m quite sure most of us would! Not being able to get rid of our government on their own, government has basically replaced government de jure with government de facto. Here is a definition of this word de facto:

   It is an adjective and means: “Existing in actuality, especially when contrary to or not established by law. In fact; in reality; actually existing, whether with or without legal or moral right: as, a government or a governor de facto. Actually; in fact; in reality.” Well there is another term we should become familiar with and it is— “legal fiction”. Yes, it is legal, but it is also fiction (does not exist technically). It is legal because it comes from the law, but it is fiction as it is not as the law intended. There may be circumstantial evidence, but no clear evidence or even a single eyewitness exists. Even adoption is an example of “legal fiction”. You or I may have our father’s last name, but we may not be biologically related to him. That you or I would be his child is legal, but that we are his real children is, fiction.

   Then there is the Insurrection Act of 1807. This is a United States federal law that has been used and amended since 1807. It basically empowers the President of the United States to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion. Several presidents, the first being Jefferson in 1808 and the last, George H.W. Bush in 1992, have used it. Abraham Lincoln invoked the Insurrection Act, April 15, 1861 against: South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas. This law requires that presidents first publicly announce his/her intentions and give a limited time to disperse. Lincoln gave them 25 days.

§254. Proclamation to disperse
Whenever the President considers it necessary to use the militia or the armed forces under this chapter, he shall, by proclamation, immediately order the insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time.

Excerpt from the Insurrection Act: U.S. Code CHAPTER 13—INSURRECTION

   In 2021, there are those, which believe the former president invoked the Insurrection Act and many believe it occurred on a specific date like 1.19.2021, the day before the last presidential inauguration? Others do not believe this. It is not clear if there ever was a public proclamation to disperse or a designated time to do so. The only thing clear is that the U.S. Capitol is surrounded by fences and guarded by National Guard troops and other law enforcement, called to some purpose. It is not even clear why they are there or how long they are to remain. Some believe until sometime in March? No matter, because of the acts taken by President Lincoln in 1863 (the Conscription Act and the Lieber Code), and all the actions which have followed to this day, we are all still under Martial Law! Every person, each state, the executive, legislative and judiciary locally, statewide and federally all are under the control of the military, which answer to their commander and chief, the president of the United States.

   What is the difference between the Insurrection Act and Martial Law?

   The Insurrection Act is a federal law that empowers the president to deploy the military to suppress certain situations including civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.

   Martial law, is a concept that doesn’t have a legal definition in the U.S. At its most extreme, it reflects the suspension of civil authority by the military, which controls civilian functions such as the courts. The key to understating this is the words, “Controls civil functions”! The Constitution for The United States of America use the following: “extraordinary Occasions” and “public safety require it”. Some state of emergency or National State of Emergency brings it about, real, perceived or manipulated.

   In 1866, the Supreme Court ruled that martial law couldn’t be imposed where civil courts are open and functioning. Martial law as a state of affairs arises from a total breakdown of civil order. But President Lincoln had already imposed Martial Law in 1863 by the Conscription Act and the Lieber Code. Neither act was ever canceled completely. We are therefore, still under Martial Law.

   Let me ask you, does it matter if any actions proceeding from the acts of 1863 were intentional or just continued? It may matter morally, but in practice, these acts were committed and the following actions since, were taken. Instead of government de jure (pure law), it is government de facto (present reality). It is legal fiction.

   Complicated? Confused? It is worse and it gets worse. This is only the abbreviated version! I did not and you did not write this stuff and neither did our founders and are original documents never intended for us to envy the privileges granted by and to so a few or for you and I to have strife and to be confused!

“For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.”

James 3:16 The Bible, King James Version (KJV)

   So how is this all to be undone? Do we treat the symptoms or remove the cause? Like playing hide-and-seek are we looking in the right place? Surely there is a remedy, simple and easy to understand? Yes, Yes there is!!

   Next time in Part 4 we will continue to look at some of the actions taken since, 1863



1 of WE,


Acts and Actions—Part 2

February 12, 2021

short url to this post: https://wp.me/pGfx1-NS

Acts and Actions—Part 2

By Dahni
© 2021, all rights reserved

The red ball is an act which leads to actions

Acts and Actions—Part 2
(The Acts which led to the actions taken ever since)

1.   Abraham Lincoln’s birth: February 12, 1809. Today is his 212th birthday, by the way.

2.   Republican National Convention: Last day May 18, 1860 Lincoln nominated for president after third round of ballots cast.

3.   Presidential election held: November 6th, 1860 a four way race and despite the fact that Lincoln was not on the ballot in 7 southern states. He was still elected, needing only 152 out of 303 electoral votes (he had 180), and a majority of the popular vote, 39.8% with 81.2% voter turnout.

4.   1st inauguration: Abraham Lincoln, 16th President Monday, March 4, 1861. After taking office in March of 1861, Mr. Lincoln not only faced a constitutional crisis of epic proportions, but he was also forced to deal with the reality of the most formidable domestic enemy to the American people and to U.S. Constitution the nation had ever witnessed. Several southern states threatened to secede if he was elected. First was SC on 12/20/1860, shortly after the presidential election, just about a month earlier on November 6th, 1860. Then, one by one the last 10 seceded within the year. Lincoln also chose four of his opponents from the Republican convention, to be members of his cabinet. Perhaps he ascribed to the belief of, “keeping your friends close and your enemies closer”?

5.   Walkout of Congress: When Abraham Lincoln took office on March 4th, 1861, seven southern states, their senators and representatives walked out of Congress. Those representatives and senators had already announced their intentions or would soon do so. Some of their states had already seceded. But it was quite certain and only a matter of time, before four more southern states and their U.S. senators and representatives would also leave the Union, preferring the Confederacy.

6.   Adjournment (without a day to reconvene), 37th U.S. Congress, March 28, 1861

7.   Battle of Fort Sumter: April 12-13, 1861. The South captures the fort.

8.   “extraordinary Occasions” clause from the Constitution invoked by Lincoln: April 15, 1861. Lincoln orders both houses of Congress to convene July 4, 1861. And in the absence of Congress, he invokes Article IV, Section 4. Calling forth the militia, Clause 1, of the U.S. Constitution, to call forth the Militia.

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”

Article IV, Section 4. Clause 1, U.S. Constitution

9.   Suspension of habeas Corpus: 37th Congress 1st Session in Senate, Thursday July 4th, 1861. Congress convened as commanded by the President on the day and time as demanded. Sandwiched between the proclamation convening both houses of Congress and calling up the militia [the Guard] on May 15, 1861, and Congress complying on July 4. 1861, there is another “extraordinary Occasion” we need to look into. Habeas Corpus, from Latin means, “You have the body.” The writ of habeas corpus is a judicial mandate requiring that a prisoner be brought before the court to determine whether the government has the right to continue detaining them. On April 27, 1861, President Abraham Lincoln in Maryland suspended the writ of habeas corpus. Whoa – Back up! Wait just a minute! Where did the president get the authority to do that?

“The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended,
unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion
the public Safety may require it.”

Article I, Section 9. Clause 2, U.S. Constitution

   Article I, in the Constitution is specific to the Congress of the United States. But the Congress had adjourned. So to recap:

a. An “extraordinary Occasion” existed, authorizing the president to convene both houses. Today, we may think of such as a state of or a national state of emergency. Real or made up, all one has to do is to declare a state of emergency and ordinary occasions do not apply:

b. Since the legislature could not be convened, the president [“Executive”] is authorized to protect the states against invasion and domestic violence.

c. Since the legislature had adjourned/could not be convened, habeas corpus could only be suspended in cases of:

rebellion – invasion – as public safety [national or state of emergency] may require it

   It is obvious that the president viewed the situation as an a. b. c. or all the above. If the Congress had adjourned, who but the executive branch could suspend the writ of habeas corpus? Why was it suspended April 27, 1861? Maryland and specifically Baltimore was in close proximity to Washington D.C. The state was divided as some favored the South and some the North. Secession had not been decided upon yet. There was tension and there were riots. Local Militia actions and the threat that Maryland would secede leaving Washington D.C. vulnerable and surrounded by hostile territory, were other considerations. General-in-Chief of the Union forces, Winfield Scott wanted to bombard Baltimore. Other Union generals wanted to set up military courts. Because of these escalating circumstances, President Lincoln decided to, instead of all of the above, to suspend the writ of habeas corpus. And Congress was not yet in session to consider a suspension of the writs. How was this act responded to? It was challenged in court and overturned by the U.S. Circuit Court in Maryland by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney.

   In those days, some Supreme Court judges also acted as Federal Circuit Court judges. Taney was one of them and he chose to hear the case in Federal Court in Baltimore, rather than have it heard by the Supreme Court in Washington D.C. Lincoln ignored Taney’s order. In July of 1861, when Lincoln had ordered both houses to convene, a joint resolution was introduced, approving Lincoln’s suspension order of April 27, 1861. In the Senate, a filibuster by Democrats held the floor to prevent a vote, in opposition to the precise wording of the resolution. Senator Lyman Trumbull prevented a vote on the resolution and it was never brought up again. The same senator introduced his own bill later, but a vote never took place before the session ended.

   Lincoln ordered most prisoners released on February 14, 1862. This ended the court challenges for at least awhile. But there was resistance to his proclamation [presidential order] of April 15, 1861 calling the Militia into service of the United States. Due to this resistance, in September of 1862, Lincoln suspended habeas corpus again. No matter how you and I or anyone may choose to view these times or these acts, they certainly were, “extraordinary Occasions.”

   If we agree with Lincoln that the “Union is [was] unbroken” or not, the responses were “Extraordinary”. If secession of the southern states was legal or not, the times and the responses to it were “Extraordinary.” If the circumstances were and are questionable as to why these acts took place, the President of the United States had every legal and constitutional right and the responsibility to execute the “Law of the Land.” According to the Constitution, the government swears or affirms by oath, to protect all the states from “invasion” or “rebellion.” And the “public safety” warranted a National emergency, a state of emergency. “extraordinary Occasions,” require “Extraordinary” responses. Note: habeas corpus was all but continued for the duration of this conflict.

Extraordinary responses:

   The former “ordinary” Executive, Legislative and Judiciary branches due to “extraordinary Occasions”, became each “extraordinary.” Each branch became increasingly under the control of or the authority of the President of the United States. Three actions which all started from the “extraordinary Occasions” were ordinarily under the authority of the Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary branches of government. Three actions under the direction of the Executive branch changed the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary branches:

a. Convened both houses of Congress
b. Called up the Militia
c. Suspension of habeas corpus

10.   Conscription Act: March 3rd, 1863 This was signed into law (called a proclamation), by then president, Lincoln. It was to draft able minded and bodied individuals to serve in the military. There were compassionate exceptions for example, if you were an elderly parent, grandparent etc. and had only one son, grandson and etc., they would not have to serve, in order for them to take care of you. You could send someone else for you. Like whom? Perhaps one could send a slave as their acceptable replacement? You could also pay a fee ($300.00 = about $3,000.00 to $30,000 today). This not only upset many people, riots ensued because of it, and former slaves and rich people (“money men”), were lynched in public on the street corners of many major and crowded cities. The movie, ‘Gangs of New York’ showed some of this violence, but attributed it mostly to gangs (rival volunteer fire departments actually), crowded and unsafe conditions. But this provision in the ‘conscription act’ did not end as it was intended.

   But there was more to ‘the conscription act’, much more. To enforce it and make sure the citizenry were complying with the law and to insure they had the required number of troops to prosecute this conflict, they set each state (including the southern states if and when they were invaded and occupied), into districts. These districts would correspond to the congressional districts, so many people, per one US representative. Each “district” had to have three individuals assigned. One was a physician to see if each person was fit to serve, another individual and one military provost. Yes, each district was under the control of the military, answerable to their commander and chief, the president of the United States. Even though Andrew Johnson (who succeeded Lincoln), ended the draft portion of this act and some other minor matters, the “districts”, district states remain to this day. They answer to the district courts, which answer to the “District of Columbia (Washington D.C.), and they and the U.S. Supreme Court, answer to, the president of the United States, to this day.

11.   The Lieber Code April 24, 1863

   The Constitution deals primarily with three types of law:

Common Law * Equity Law * Admiralty Law

   For Our purposes here, think of Admiralty Law as International Law or Roman law.

   International Law deals with relationships between or among nations. The United Nations deals with International Law. In order for there to be an invasion of one or more nations, one or more nations must be involved in invading the nation or the nations. An invasion was forming in 1861, under “extraordinary Occasions,” and implemented in 1863.

   April 24, 1863 General Orders No. 100 Lieber Code signed by Lincoln. The Lieber Code is on file at the International Court of Justice. The “Lieber Code” is named in honor of its drafter, Dr. Francis Lieber, a law professor who had two sons, one fought for the Union and other for the Confederacy during the 1861-65 Conflict.
The Lieber Code is based on Roman law. It deals with how one or more nations should operate in invading and occupying one or more nations.

   Remember ‘The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act’ was passed by Congress and signed into law by the President, March 3, 1863? It basically was time-stamped until the war ended. Remember, ‘The Lieber Code and Martial Law had conditions to end its authority?

“2. Martial law does not cease during the hostile
occupation, except by special proclamation,
ordered by the commander-in-chief,
or by special mention in the treaty
of peace concluding the war,…”

Excerpts from The Lieber Code of April 24, 1863

   Was there ever any order by the Commander and Chief to end the Lieber Code? I cannot find any such order by any president, Congress or Supreme Court. Was there ever any peace treaty concluding the War? There never was any such peace treaty!

“The United States went to war in 1861 to preserve the Union; it emerged from the war in 1865 having created a nation. Before the two words ‘United States were generally used as a plural noun: ‘the United States are a republic.’ After 1865 the United States became a singular noun. The loose union of states became a nation.”

James M. McPherson,
‘Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution’
Oxford University Press, 1991, p. viii.

“The de facto transition of the United States from a federation to a federal state
is marked by the gradual use of a singular rather than a plural verb.”

Charles G. Fenwick, International Law, 3d rev. ed.
Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1948), p. 148 n. 62.

“Legal Fictions” “are not allowed to be carried further
than the reasons which introduced them necessarily require.”

Excerpt from Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition, 1856

12.   April 9, 1865, Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered his 28,000 troops to Union General Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Court House, bringing an end to the Civil Conflict. But it took until the end of 1865, for every battle to end and all the military of the southern states to surrender.

13.   April 14, 1865, Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States, was assassinated. Lincoln died the following day at 7:22 am, April 15, 1865.

   Did Lincoln ever cancel ‘The inscription Act? No he did not. Did he ever cancel ‘The Lieber Code’ or sign a peace treaty with the southern states? No he did not.

“Where was the treaty signed? There was no treaty signed to end the Civil War. The surrender at Appomattox Court House was a military surrender of an army, which was surrounded. The Confederate government never surrendered and even had it wanted to the United States government would likely not have accepted. To do so would have legally acknowledged the existence of the Confederate States of America and would have legitimized it and given it certain legal status internationally. Treaties are between two nations and the U.S. would never concede the legal existence of the Confederacy – even though it had a government, armies, taxes and all the trappings of a modern government.”

From The National Parks Service

   Remember the Constitution was authored to limit government and bind it to the Constitution? The Colonists’ intent was not to create a SOVEREIGN (Sovereign nation), but rather, to further bind the Branches of government. This is made clear in the Preamble to The Bill Of Rights-December 15, 1791.

“THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.”

Excerpts from the Preamble to the Bill of Rights

“Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.”

George Washington, speech of January 7, 1790
In the Boston Independent Chronicle, January 14, 1790

   This was just the beginning of “Legal Fiction.” And what is “legal fiction”? To begin, it is a legal term. It begins legally, but when it prolongs longer than it was intended, intentionally or not, it becomes fiction. Instead of de jure (pure law), it becomes de facto (presently or as a matter of fact), law and what were intended to be “extraordinary Occasions”, became for all practical matters, Ordinary occasions.

   So my many ones of WE, there you have the acts, all of them, which have led us to where we are today. Unless you are over 158 years old today, not a one of us have ever lived in the republic as ratified by Our Constitution in 1789. The names of the states are the same, borders are mostly the same except for West Virginia separating from Virginia. The capitol in Washington D.C. is still there. The Declaration of Independence still applies, the Constitution for the United States of America still exists and WE are still the People. But one thing changed in 1863 and because of it, we have lived our entire lives under Martial Law, as if the military were still engaged in the conflict that ripped us apart in 1861-1865. Since Lincoln never RESET the Republic into ordinary Occasions, we are still under extraordinary Occasions. So how then are all the actions since, possible?

   Inter arma enim silent lēgēs is a Latin phrase literally meaning “For among arms, the laws are silent,” but it is more popularly rendered as, “In times of war, the law falls silent.”

   In order for these things to continue either intentionally or not, they must do so by some National State of emergency— real, perceived or intentionally used to manipulate. This is exactly what has transpired, ever since 1863. Each branch of government all vie for dominance and power, at the expense of you and I. This is done regularly. New ‘states of emergencies’ arise or others are renewed by Congress (every 12 years), in their codified ‘Statutes at Large’, also known as, ‘The U.S. Code.’ The U.S. Code has 51 titles and all information about any given subject, may not always be found in where we might think. But of these 51, there are such things as, ‘The Military Code’, ‘The IRS Code’ ‘The Judiciary Code’ and so forth. Just like in 1865, if not canceled, overturned or rescinded, they are still on the books; they are still applicable law.

   Would you be interested in knowing that our government (that are supposed to be our servants), list us each and all as enemy combatants? Each of us work for the government and every time we sign our federal tax returns, we are indicating that the information we are providing (under penalty of perjuries (plural), is that the information is true to the best of our knowledge. Do you know what this is called? It is called a tacit (silent), oath. You and I are under oath and we work for the government, we are enemy combatants, and we have no rights, just privileges? Yes! Oh, there’s more, a lot more, but I don’t want to become depressed, cause you to be depressed and without hope! There is hope! There is a remedy!!! But just like hide and seek, we have to look for the right things, the right person(s) and in the right places. Instead of treating symptoms, we need to eliminate the cause and the symptoms will disappear.

   To conclude here, if you are angry at Abraham Lincoln and want to blame him for all of this, I can certainly understand how you might feel. Abraham Lincoln was among my favorite presidents until I discovered the “acts” that he took. I was angry! But I just want to say today, on his birthday, I have discovered two important things he did which form my present opinion, that if he was not assassinated, he would have RESET our Republic, back into ordinary Occasions, of the Constitution for the United States of America!

   So those are the Acts. Next time we will look at some of the “actions”, conspiracies, and theories some believe, will RESET our Republic. Here is a hint, though these may seem important and seek to overturn these actions, the fact is, the acts all happened in mostly 1863 and everything else is just a continuance. We are all still today, all under martial law. The actions since are moot or really don’t matter with regards to the undoing. The cause has been found. We just need to discovery the remedy and to RESET our Republic.



1 of WE,


Acts and Actions—Part 1

February 8, 2021

short url to this post: https://wp.me/pGfx1-Nq

Acts and Actions—Part 1

By Dahni
© 2021, all rights reserved

The red ball is an act which leads to actions

   I have read much of late from lawyers and legal minds, trying to educate the population that certain actions taken by Congress in 1870 and 1871 and later revised, was in essence, the incorporation of Washington D.C., as a foreign government, operating within it’s 10 square miles. Some believe that the last true president of our republic was the 18th, Ulysses S Grant, who signed the ‘Organic act of 1871’, incorporating the District of Columbia as a foreign corporation.

   Other actions taken, others believe that the creation of the Federal Reserve, the Banking Act, the confiscation of gold and silver and replacing it with Federal Reserve notes (paper money), was the undoing of the Republic we were all taught to believe existed.

   Some believe these things existed before 1776 in our lands and are unchanged, by order of King James, in 1609 and his successors.

   Still, others believe the alliance among the military might of the USA, the financial controls in London, England and the religious control of the Vatican in Italy is an unholy alliance of global elitists, bent on world domination, a ‘New World Order.

   Some believe this is the global ‘Reset’, taking place right in the present.

   Then there others that believe this foreign corporation, this foreign government was seized by the military on January 20, 2021, bankrupted, disbanded and is now under military seizure, occupation and control. Some believe that when our rightful civil government is restored, the new president, following Grant at 18, will be the 19th president of our rightful republic.

   Others believe this military engagement and occupation is waiting, for the right moment after the population has been sufficiently awakened, to see the digital war and corruption of many, many years.

   Some believe it is being seen right now.

   And some, disillusioned, frustrated, confused, and afraid, fear that, “We are all just screwed.” I don’t want to be in despair. I do not desire this state for anyone. But I will be honest with you. If we want something different than what we have, we are going to have to do something different to get it. It will not be easy. It will require effort on your part and my part and our part.

   Though patience is a virtue, many seem to have little to none. They surround themselves, they barricade their lives with conspiracies and theories or hopes and dreams. Even simple things as “trust the plan” and “trust the man” are lobbied from within their perceived defensive positions. But when help does not appear to be coming or coming fast enough, they feel abandoned or deceived. They lose faith or stop believing. They cease from taking action. But a true military operation does not happen this way. Most may think that to “trust the plan” is arrogant and void of strategy. To the military, they do not take orders from us WE the People. They salute and carry on with the “plan” and strategies and timetables, to execute for that with which they are required by oaths to the Constitution For the United States of America and that is, to defend us from all enemies, foreign and domestic. They are bedrock, a pillar, and the bulwark in defense of our equal and unalienable rights as Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. What do we, what are the rest of us to do? What is our part? What is your part, my part, and our individual parts? What is our individual right and duty in all of this?

   I have read posts and articles and comments and viewed videos (it seems countless in numbers), from many people and sources. “Research, Research, Research,” is a common mantra. So too are such things as I have been awake or looking into these things for: 10, 20, 30 or 40 years. Can so differing accounts all be right? Are some honest mistakes and yet still misinformation? Was, is information purposely deleted or intentionally manipulated? Can there be any doubt when there is so much division that WE the People are, so poorly educated, intentionally or not?

“Educate and inform the whole mass of the people… They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.”

-Thomas Jefferson-

   That sounds great, for an old dead guy, but educate the “whole mass of people” of today with what?

   Often there is some relief expressed by many who were and are considered crazy from trying to awaken others with such notions, by saying they are not crazy as things play out currently, and more are waking up and getting angry over being so long deceived. Here is a question. If the actions of 1871 were the cause of our undoing, undoing that would set things aright? Is this true, is this correct? It was an action, but it was not an act, which started all the motion, like the red ball (act), hitting the other balls (actions), from the image, above.

    I too have researched for a long time, such controversial and some would say, conspiratorial matters. To my best recollection for me, this began in 1976. This began for me, almost 45 years ago. But guess what, none of that really matters!!! To explain, let me begin by asking you another question.

   Have you ever played ‘hide and seek’ as a child? The rules were pretty simple. Whoever started the game would ‘hide’ and everyone else would ‘seek’ or look for them. Places would only change if one person found the one that was hiding. Then they got to hide and the rest would seek for them.

   Imagine yourself as one of the ‘seekers’. Where would you start to look? Human nature would compel you to look as far and as near as you could see with your eyes. Perhaps other senses were involved, but for the most part it was by sight. You would look near and far, up, down, over, above and under. If you could not find them, you had a thought, maybe they are over there, someplace in the distance, outside of your sight or perhaps in another room or some other place? So you would go there to seek and with hope to find. If you could not find them or no matter how long it took, the answer to both is the same. You or I just weren’t looking in the right place. For this post or article, we just were not looking for the right time, to the acts, or the cause.

   Quite often in life or in a game of hide and seek, we find where we least expect, right in front of us, in plain sight or from public sources. We may think of this oddity as, ‘hidden in plain view or sight. This is because, we go looking for something or someone and expect it or them to be hiding, missing or lost, in a certain place.

   In the medical practice, if we are sick or hurt, there are symptoms. We go see a doctor and most times they do, give or prescribe something to treat our symptoms. But if the cause is removed, the symptoms will disappear. This is nothing new!

“Virgil, (aka Publius Vergilius Maro, a Roman Poet, 70BC to 19BC) said in Latin” “Aegrescit Medendo” which literally means “it becomes worse for the treatment used,” but is often translated as “the cure is worse than the disease.” This Latin phrase and the following are usually found in ‘Medical Latin phrases.’ “Ablata causa tollitur effectus” – “If the cause is taken away, its effect will disappear.” As I said, remove the cause and the symptoms will disappear. But not knowing the cause, we, government and our doctor often just try and treat the symptoms.”

Excerpt From: ‘Reset ‘ (An Un-alien’s Guide to Resetting Our Republic)
By Dahni © 2012, all rights reserved

see: ResetBook.com for more information

   If someone desires good health, one must first ask oneself if he or she is ready to do away with the reasons for this illness, disease, bacteria, virus and etc. Only then is it possible to help them. So just like playing the game of ‘hide and seek’, we have to seek to find. If we do not find we either don’t look long enough or we are just looking in the wrong place.

   Freedom of speech is both a right and a duty. To allow or disavow bear the benefits of fruit, which will preserve, protect and defend or the consequences of poisonous fruit, which will waste, destroy and desert. The freedom of speech as a right and a duty is to test whether it bears fruit or poisonous fruit. It is not the removal of speech (darkness), which reveals the fruit or the poisonous fruit, it is light. No one can remove a right that they did not have to give. This only serves to expose them as bearing poisonous fruit. Without exercising our rights, without exercising our duty, this is also, to bear poisonous fruit. So, we each need to know what our rights are, from whence they come and to exercise them. If we do not our duty and exercise our rights, our rights are not gone, we just don’t realize them and bear its fruit, only the consequences of poisonous fruit.

   So, what is the cause of our troubles? Do we seek to treat symptoms or do we truly desire to find the cause, take the necessary actions, do our duty, and exercise our rights and experience the symptoms being eliminated? Well, first, we need to look in the right places. We have to seek to find. We have to research. We have to become educated. We have to exercise. We have to do our duty. We each must be responsible for our own lives!

   Human nature is to do as little as possible of what we think we have to do and even if we should, but our expectations are great. Thousands of years ago, before the nation of Israel was to be, God called his people out of bondage in Egypt. Their requirements for Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness were simple and basic. If they would be God’s people, He would be their God, preserve and protect them and lead them to a land, “flowing with milk and honey.” And for awhile, they followed and God did what he promised with many signs and wonders. Moses left them for awhile to commune with God. The people grew impatient, fearful and turned to the ways of their former bondage. They wanted Aaron to make them a calf of Gold and they turned to another God. Later they wanted a King. God told them that a King would take all their wives, families, friends, possessions and their property, The people persisted. God allowed them to choose. He had no other choice, for He gave them all, freedom of will. Their first king did as God said he would. The people instead of taking responsibility for their error, they blamed God. It does not matter to me if you believe God or believe in God. The Bible is either God’s word or it is the word of men and women. Whichever it is, it is worth the reading, for understanding human nature.

   Human nature has not changed much to this day. We expect and demand much of our families, friends, spouses, loved ones, employers, employees, associates, society, all the “free” stuff we have and use, and leaders and then blame these all, for our failures and still refuse to accept our own responsibility. Do not children do these same things? Are we children? But the words to this effect of our nature were written in The Declaration of Independence, in 1776.

“…all experience hath shewn [shows], that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.”

Excerpt: The Declaration of Independence

   But read the very next line in the above document.

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.”

Excerpt: The Declaration of Independence

    Are you and I tired of “suffering evils” yet? Have you and I felt or do we feel as if we have been reduced under absolute despotism yet? Do you and I know it is our right and our duty to throw off such a government? Are we ready to reset our Constitution or provide new Guards for our future security that best effects our safety and happiness yet?

   Just so I am clear, whose “right” does this refer to? You and I! And that document is the reason, for our government. The reason for our government is to protect, defend and serve to best effect our Lives, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, which is the purpose of our government. Today, it is no less our right and our duty and it is no less a “necessity” today, for each of us to do so!

   There have been many actions taken before 1776 and ever since 1776. But the same cause which led to 1776 and the exact same cause which now may lead to us to the remedy of our present distress is the same. I am not about to discredit anyone’s research. I am not going to challenge anyone for what they believe. That is your right and my right to believe as we do. I am not about to show my 40+ years of research since 1976 because, I was looking in the wrong place and though some or all may be important, it is not important enough! I want facts. I want the truth. I want it so simple that I can understand it and that anyone else can too! I will show you not how smart I am, but only what I have found and it’s all out in the open, in public places. If you want to give me some credit, I did seek until, I did find. So could have you! So could anyone! So it can still be done today!

   There have indeed been many actions, but fewer acts which have led us to this point in time. We must seek to find the acts. Were these acts from 2020? Were they from the 1930’s? Were these acts of 1870 and 1871? Was it a flawed document, the purpose of our government, The Constitution for the United States of America, in 1789? Were these acts done sometime even before 1776? At what point in time were these acts done? When playing hide and seek, we need to seek to find and keep seeking until we do. The time is shortened, if we look in the right place. If we want to get well and feel better, do we just want to treat the symptoms or remove the cause? Remove the cause and the symptoms will cease!

   In Part 2, we will look for and discover together, the specific acts from a specific time, left unanswered, which led to all the actions ever since that fester and pester us to this day.

1 of WE,



January 29, 2021

Short url to this post: https://wp.me/pGfx1-N7


By Dahni

© 2021, all rights reserved

   Trust is a word most of us have have heard, most of our lives. As a noun, it is usually paired with a either a pronoun like him, her, them etc. or another noun like mom, dad, grandma, grandfather, other family members and people we are familiar with, other people and things and even God. The latter is found in the motto of, the United States for America, “In God WE Trust.”
   There are more catchy terms like: trust the system, trust your eyes,👀 trust your gut or growing up with ‘Superman’ comics, cartoons and live action TV 📺 series, trust Superman’s motto. “Truth, Justice and the American Way.”🇺🇸
   If I had a headache, I trusted my mom that she would give me this little white pill (Bufferin®), and it would go away, just by swallowing it and before it could actually get into my bloodstream and do its thing. I trusted that Santa Clause had come when I saw the carrots for the reindeer missing, the glass of milk empty, the cookies 🍪 on the plate left for him were gone with only crumbs left, and presents 🎁 left under the tree, 🌲 with tags that read, ‘From Santa’. I trusted that the Easter Bunny had come and left hidden eggs 🥚 🥚 for me to find. I trusted that if I lost a tooth, 🦷 left it under my pillow, and found money 💰 in its place the next morning, the Tooth Fairy 🧚‍♂️ had come.
   I grew up. Was I then taught mis-trust’ and not to trust or did I learn not to trust from examples? Was my trust validated or in-validated? We have all and each have been led down some road, led astray and left sorely disappointed from trust which in the end proved to be un-trust-worthy.
   Currently there seems to be a lot of mis-trust’ or lack of trust. Many do not trust politicians, the U.S. Congress, government locally, statewide and federally. Many don’t trust Medical Practice. It is in essence just “practice” and like we its patients are, but lab experiments, 🧫guinea pigs 🐖 and rats. 🐀 Many don’t trust the police 👮‍♀️ and law enforcement. Many don’t trust our teachers, professors and educators. Many of us don’t trust each other. And many of us don’t even trust our eyes and ears and our other senses. And many of us don’t trust our guts, feelings, intuition, revelation, and epiphanies. Many of us just don’t even trust ourselves! This is a very sad or depressing state of our lives.
   I have given some (not a complete list), ideas of what trust is NOT. But I want to share what trust is, what it really is and how we can obtain it and why we should.
   It’s time for a story. It is more than Oh No, not history, but part of his-story. Whose story? It is his-story, George Washington’s. He was appointed as the Commander of the Continental Army. He had military experience, but had never commanded such a number of troops before. And who were these troops? Most were farmers, slaves, addicts and criminals. Few had any military experience at all. All were volunteers!
   Oh, most of us heard the stories of them being ill-equipped, ill-fed, and even ill-clothed. If they somehow won some battle or skirmish, often they were forced to cobble together pieces of guns discarded or partially destroyed from their enemy, the British, to make a complete weapon. It was common that such a thing would have exploded in their faces, the first time it was fired. Their successes were few, their failures frequent and their embarrassment greater, being no match for their enemy who so easily defeated them, routed them, left them to die or retreat to the savage nature of the weather and the wild wilderness.
   We know of their being run out of their own capitol in their day by the British, occupying Philadelphia, PA. We have read of their trek through the snow where they left a trail of blood from the rags worn as shoes on their feet, where had their enemy decided to have pursued them, the war would have ended right there. We have heard of their winter in Valley Forge, where starvation, typhoid  fever, respiratory ailments from their cold and drafty and smoke filled huts and that smallpox, wiped out 50% of their already small numbers. And we have seen paintings or some artist’s rendition, of them crossing the Delaware river at night, in blistering wind, cold, snow and fog.
   But did we ever hear or were we ever taught what happened, on December 31st, 1776?

   Most of if not all of Washington’s troops had served their agreed time of service. They were tired, worn out, had not been paid, hadn’t seen their families in over a year and they were spent and ready to go home. Washington mounted his horse and dressed in his best attire. He knew he had little to offer. He did not consider himself an orator or a military genius. But he knew his men had followed him because he was civilized, mannerly; a moral man of wealth, willing to risk everything for ‘the cause’, not as a behind-the-battle general, but out front, risking everything, he asked his troops to risk. He asked them to stay awhile longer. No one was willing to do more. Washington rode off and no one followed him. He stopped, turned around, gathered his thoughts and rode back towards his troops and spoke to them, just 85 words. He said:
“My brave fellows, you have done all I asked you to do, and more than could be reasonably expected, but your country is at stake, your wives, your houses, and all that you hold dear. You have worn yourselves out with fatigues and hardships, but we know not how to spare you. If you will consent to stay one month longer, you will render that service to the cause of liberty, and to your country, which you can probably never do under any other circumstances.”
George Washington December 31st, 1776
   Every last man followed him! And WE the People today, are the recipients of this trust! They trusted Washington and they followed without any guarantees of any success. And this Ladies and Gentlemen is, trust and how you know it is warranted or invalidated. Washington trust-ed’ in ‘The Cause’ and in Divine Providence, and he took action. His troops trusted in Washington and took action. In God WE Trust? Take action!
   Today, our fight is no less real. It is not fought with bullets and guns and bayonets, but by tweets, posts, emails, speech and words. Our battle is not fought upon the field, but from home, shops, places of worship, or places of work, schools and all and mostly, in the digital world. Our weapons are ideas, principles and rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, with keystrokes, computers, laptops, notebooks, pads, cellphones, letters and notes through the mail, school board meetings and town board and town hall meetings, letters to the editors of our papers, websites, social media, podcasts, radio broadcasts, cable news, television programs, stations and networks, word to word and face to face. Ours is no less real a revolution against those that would keep or make us slaves. Ours is no less a spiritual battle against good and evil. Ours is a revolution in the digital world.
“I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
excerpt from a speech by: Patrick Henry, 1775
   It is to the death of our Republic we must fight against. Today is our day to decide! Today is our 1775!
“…mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
excerpt from: The Declaration of Independence, 1776
   Today is this our day and our 1776!
   We must stand upon our feet and take action. We must either kneel willingly at the prayer altar of God or kneel as slaves beneath the feet of globalists and elitists. WE must trust in God. WE Trust and take action. Shout it from the keyboards, cells phones, social media, media, Big Tech and government, from the every place, to every person, from every house and rooftop! Let our actions cause the stones beneath our feet to shout!  “Consent to stay, one month longer!” Consent to stay another and another, whatever it takes! Trust and Act! Trust!!!

See this post also at Dahni Just Imagine blog:



1 of WE





Rules of Civility

January 16, 2021

Short url to this post: https://wp.me/pGfx1-Mq

Image from: mountvernon.org – George Washington’s Rules of Civility

Rules of Civility

By Dahni

© 2021, all rights reserved

   Following my previous post, ‘Transition’ https://wp.me/pGfx1-Ma  I want to begin here where I left off there. There was a quote by John Adams in my last post which I want to begin with here.

“We have no Constitution which functions in the absence of a moral people.”

-John Adams-

   I could ask the question, are we a moral people, but I will not. However, I certainly do believe there exists among us, moral persons! How many? I do not know, but I do believe there are enough to keep the rest of us afloat, the earth to keep on spinning and light to keep us from plunging into total darkness.

   I would hope that the rest of us would aspire to becoming (a continual lifelong process), a moral people.

   This brings us to the subject of civility, the rules of civility. The words “civilization” and “civility” have as their root, the word “civil“.  But rules? Oh no, not rules! You don’t like rules? Where is there freedom in rules? OK, how about order? No, too much like orders and being told what to do? No one likes to be told what to do. Children don’t like to be told what to do. My dog does not like it. No one likes to be told what to do. But try to build a house without rules. Why not from the top down? Going fishing? Fish don’t generally jump into the boat. The rule there is, if I want fish, I need to bait my line. My dog is not allowed to cross the road without my permission, why? Because I’m mean or do I just want to keep her a live?

   When George Washington was a young boy in school, he was taught rules, rules of civility, and to be exact, 110 rules of civility.

Image from: mountvernon.org – George Washington’s Rules of Civility

   ‘Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation’, which listed 110 rules of etiquette for young men [and young ladies too], were originally compiled and published in 1595 by French Jesuits. In 1645, this code of conduct was translated into an English version called ‘Francis Hawkins’ Youths Behavior, or Decency in Conversation Amongst Men’ [women too]. They were ascribed to Francis Hawkins the twelve-year-old son of a doctor. It was reprinted at least eleven times until 1672.

   By age sixteen, Washington had copied out by hand, these 110 Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation. Was this only for the practice of his penmanship?

“Today many, if not all of these rules, sound a little fussy if not downright silly. It would be easy to dismiss them as outdated and appropriate to a time of powdered wigs and quills, but they reflect a focus that is increasingly difficult to find. The rules have in common a focus on other people rather than the narrow focus of our own self-interests that we find so prevalent today. Fussy or not, they represent more than just manners. They are the small sacrifices that we should all be willing to make for the good of all and the sake of living together. These rules proclaim our respect for others and in turn give us the gift of self-respect and heightened self-esteem.”

excerpt from: http://www.foundationsmag.com/civility.html

   Richard Brookhiser, in his book on Washington wrote that “all modern manners in the western world were originally aristocratic. Courtesy meant behavior appropriate to a court; chivalry comes from chevalier – a knight. Yet Washington was to dedicate himself to freeing America from a court’s control. Could manners survive the operation? Without realizing it, the Jesuits who wrote them, and the young man who copied them, were outlining and absorbing a system of courtesy appropriate to equals and near-equals. When the company for whom the decent behavior was to be performed expanded to the nation, Washington was ready. Parson Weems got this right, when he wrote that it was ‘no wonder every body honored him who honored every body.'”

   This book is still available today. Some have edited and updated the language to the present. Click the next image to download a PDF copy of this book. Please note the beginning where it addresses the objections of modern-day youth that think manners is just another thing to reject in being told what to do that they reject, as a violation of the freedom of speech. This sounds like many adults today, as well.

Click for: ‘110 Rules of Civility’

   Well, if you are not interested in reading and/or Freely downloading the book in PDF format, here is one to follow. it is actually, the last one.

#110. Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of celestial fire called conscience.”

excerpt from: ‘Francis Hawkins’ Youths Behavior, or Decency in Conversation Amongst Men’ [women too].

   What is conscience?

Conscience – An awareness of morality in regard to one’s behavior; a sense of right and wrong that urges one to act morally. A source of moral or ethical judgment or pronouncement.

   One needs a code of ethics, rules or orders they live by, God, or something like an analogy of a compass which points them in the direction of good manners, civility, morals which guide them and direct their character. There are many consequences, from the continued failures (a habit), in not having good manners. How about the following? 

“Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;”

I Timothy 4:2 King James Version (KJV)

   What? Without manners I would end up speaking lies in hypocrisy, I would be a hypocrite? Is this what I am saying? No I did not say this. The Bible said it and by association, God said it. What does it mean to have my conscience seared with a hot iron? If I say something rude, hurtful or mean to you and it bothers me I am sorry I said it), after I do, I still have a conscience, but it was not working right or correctly. If I keep doing this over and over again, my conscience could get seared, and I may never feel bad again that I say rude, mean and hurtful things to you or anyone. This is NOT Freedom of Speech. Oh, I would have character, bad character and judged by my speech, my appearance, my background and perhaps even the color of my skin, but this is neither freedom of speech nor the character good manners makes.

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

   How about the ‘Golden Rule’ for social media’s user agreements and policies? How about Big Tech.? Mainstream media? Any business?

Sign that hung above the door of the employee’s entrance to the Acme Sucker Rod Factory in Toledo, Ohio, 1913.

   Can it get any simpler than this, any more clear?

“And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.”

Luke 6:31, King James Version

   Common Courtesy? That is a pretty good two-word description of true Christianity.

“Order my steps in thy word:…”

Psalm 119: 133a, KJV

“Bind them upon thy fingers, write them upon the table of thine heart.”

Proverbs 7:3, KJV

   Order? Orders again? Rules? Something or someone has to direct our steps. Sure, we will to walk, but for what purpose? These two verses address freedom of will and by association, freedom of speech. We have to will to be moral and walk with that purpose in mind, our steps directed by someone or something. But we have to do the walking. We have to make the decision to learn and to walk in the truth, in the light and develop this conscience of good manners and doing what is right. Biblically, this is a call to give the truth of divine wisdom a permanent place in the mind and in conduct.

   In Israel, it is not uncommon to write the Ten Commandments on tablets and wear them like rings on their fingers. The tables of our heart are the very place for all of God’s laws to be. The world might do away with Bibles, but they could not do away with the things that are hidden in our heart. Whether you or I believe in God or not, we each are in control of our our lives and responsible for our actions and every single word we write or speak.

   If I like you and you like me and if I agree with you and you agree with me and we speak to each other, that’s easy speech, but it is not the freedom of speech. It is only things outside of our experience and our lives which challenge and grow us up.

   Freedom of speech is not the freedom to hate. That ends with hate speech, but that is not Freedom of Speech. It leads to what is prevalent in our country (the USA, anyway), what we all seem to be familiar with, cancel culture. Words can hurt and they can heal. But incite to riot? Unless someone has a gun to your head, whose mouth and whose feet run to hurt and destroy? Doing whatever you want to do and saying whatever you want to say is your choice or mine to burn up stuff, loot, hurt or worse. Sadly, that is freedom of speech corrupted, but it is still freedom of speech. To censor, restrict, regulate, remove and cancel what we do not agree with may be the ill-conceived idea of freedom of spew or spew speech, but it is not the freedom of speech. Only respecting one another’s equal rights as you and I have, is freedom of speech.

   There is much to be gleaned from each other, no matter what we may believe. Accepting one another’s right to think and believe is freedom of speech. If for no other reason, by allowing all speech and any speech it we can learn how not to speak and act in a civilized and social society. And one more thing, perhaps our good manners can influence or lead bad manners to will to become good manners.

   It was all over the mainstream media. A young man wore a hat, many did not like it. He was confronted by people that ridiculed him and tried to intimidate him. At one point, an older native American man was beating on a drum and singing just inches away from his face. He instantly became infamous and scorched earth to the mainstream media. His high school came under fire. He was ridiculed for being a racist and arrogant and excoriated by the media for smirking, just standing there without speaking and smiling. He got a lawyer. He went to court. He won. He could now basically, purchase his own network. He had the freedom to speak or not to speak. He chose to stand, not speak and smile. What would you call that? I call it good manners.

“A soft answer turneth [turns] away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.”

Proverbs 15:11, KJV

    What about  just being kind to one another?

   My sister was given a bracelet years ago, which she wore all the time. It had a line from a poem that I only recently discovered and read in its entirety and to my delight. But I remember my sister’s bracelet and I wrote down the words in my journals and in my Bible, many years ago. I was inspired by them. They moved me. Over the years I have thought of them so often and read them so often that I have unintentionally memorized them. 

“There’s nothing so kingly as kindness, and nothing so royal as truth.”

Alice Cary

   If you would like to read this poem, ‘Nobility’, by Alice Cary, in its entirety, click the following link:


   Let us be kind to one another. When and wherever we hear speech that we do not agree with, let us hear it, let us read the words and learn from them. Let us turn away their wrath with soft answers. Let us be example of kindness. We cannot, we must not censor, regulate, restrict or cancel those that have the self-same and equal rights that we have! For freedom is a gift. Freedom leads to change, progress, inventions, innovation, and growth! It is a pursuit towards excellence that in the United States of America, was put into writing, in the Preamble of our Constitution, “In order to form a more perfect [not perfect, but a more perfect] union!”

   Are we a united people? Are we a moral people? To whom or to what compass do we use to guide our steps? what rules do we follow? What orders do we willfully take to mold and remember our thoughts and move our feet? Easy speech moves nothing or no one. Hate speech cannot, should not cancel anyone or anything. It is only the Freedom of Speech that moves mountains. What is it that can unify so great and so diverse a people, but freedom? Who among us has not been given the same gifts as you and I?

  1. created equally
  2. endowed by our creator (or the laws of nature or nature’s God)
  3. certain unalienable rights that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness

   Be kind to one another, for WE are all Free! It is a gift!


1 of WE






January 8, 2021

Short url to this post: https://wp.me/pGfx1-Ma


A Moral Issue

By Dahni

© 2020, all rights reserved

January 8th, 2021

   I have stated my position clearly on the 2020 election. Although I appreciate President Trump’s recent commitment towards the peaceful transition of power, I still believe he should immediately resign, for the good of Our Republic.

   Even so, for Twitter, any social media, any media, and any search engine which by the very freedom they all enjoy, decide to censure, suppress, restrict, lockdown or lockout the speech of the President of the United States or anyone, is unacceptable!

Deleting Twitter to the Trashcan

   Anyone siding with such inexcusable actions are unworthy of the very freedom they enjoy. For such reasons, I have deleted my Facebook accounts and pages and groups, over 8 months ago.

   As I now transition myself to delete my Twitter accounts, I encourage any freedom loving person or entity, to do the same.

   I do not do this easily, lightly or quickly.

   In its earlier years, a “tweet” (message), posted on Twitter was limited to 140 characters. This was challenging at first, but I got used to it. As it expanded to the world, Twitter offered something which no other social media did. Those 140 characters allowed users in freedom-less countries, to quickly posts messages of great importance, for all the world to see!

   In time, Twitter expanded their limitations of the characters one could “tweet”, but also, they began to limit who could post and what could be posted. Twitter and other social media enjoyed and enjoys the protection as a ‘platform’ instead of as a ‘publisher’ and could not/cannot be presently sued in the USA. A ‘platform’ was supposed to be to open to almost anyone, providing they adhered to certain civil rules. But when Twitter or any social media (Google search and all mainstream media), censors, monitors, restricts, deletes, locks down and locks out speech which is contrary to their beliefs, political viewpoints or bias, they are no longer a ‘platform’ but arbitrators of what they deem is truth and the final editors of content.

   Like most anyone that uses social media, I used Twitter as a place for my voice and to promote my work and specifically, my book, ‘RESET’ (An UN-alien’s Guide to Resetting Our Republic), and any other related updates, revisions or new work for the future. I post to my Twitter accounts from several means and often from my blogs as this. I do not have a great following. And I will miss Twitter more, than they will ever miss me.

   But the point is, freedom is not free. There is always a cost to acquire it and to keep it.

   But Twitter enjoys this freedom and protection in the USA as it comes from Our government. Our government comes from the Constitution of the United States of America. These freedoms come from the Declaration of Independence, wherein WE are all created equally and are all endowed by Our Creator with certain unalienable rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. These came from and presently come from those who fought and fight, died and will die for these and to protect and defend them for all. And many pledged and pledge their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor, for these freedoms for themselves, their families, their friends and for the future, for all of us!

   What is more powerful on earth then the desire to live and die free? For this is universal. It is spiritual. It is the gift of God. It is a moral issue. But what can be done, what is legal, with all means available and employed, matter not to an immoral mind and an immoral people. When never do we question what is right and what is moral, we exercise no freedom and freedom is lost, to every immoral mind and to immoral people.

Freedom is a moral issue, for a moral people

   As I transition to delete my Twitter accounts, I must update my websites, blogs and other social media. I will, prior to my last ‘Tweet’, provide other means, for anyone to reach me and to access my work.

1 of WE