Bread on the Bottom of US

by Dahni

© Copyright 3/9/10

all rights reserved

HOW can WE the People regain control of OUR right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? WE have delved into what won’t work in order to find what will work.

The List (simplified)

8.   Establish a new service to restore OUR rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

Today: The Bread on the Bottom of US – a summary

In a sandwich, there are usually two pieces of bread and something in the middle. In OUR republic, the piece of bread on top of US, WE the People are all the causes even though of good intentions, are divisive because, WE are not united. If WE are not united, WE are divided. It’s just that simple. The piece of bread on the bottom US, WE the People is a corrupt, corrupting and corruptible “system.” And in the middle of the sandwich is US, WE the People. What follows is a summary of the piece of bread on bottom of US.

Last time, WE saw that WE are the jam in the middle of the sandwich. WE the People are the only solution. It is US, WE the People that must tear down and rip out the corrupt, corrupting and corruptible “system,” the “legal fiction” that has co-mingled itself within OUR republic. After those brief introductory remarks…   🙂

…the summary of the bottom piece of bread beneath US, WE the People, follows. These are the facts and they are undisputed. The conclusions are yours. The “system” removed or allowed to continue, is dependent upon an overwhelming number of US, WE the People overwhelmingly recognizing and are overwhelmingly recognized that WE are the only solution!

Please Note: Since I was born in the state of Missouri and it is known as the ‘Show Me’ state, you will see the words ‘Show me,’ repeated often below.

  1. In 1861, Congress had adjourned sine die (pronounced sign-e die-e, Latin “without a day”), to reconvene. President Abraham Lincoln summoned them back by presidential order April 15, 1861, invoking the “Extraordinary occasions” clause of the U.S, Constitution Article 2 Section 3. Congress responded as ordered and citing the same clause as the president, re-convened July 4th, 1861. No matter how one looks at this, whether they choose to use the words Martial Law or not, this was not a normal constitutional Congress that re-convened on that day. Therefore, it was an Executive Congress. If you prefer, call this an Extraordinary Occasion Congress. Even though Congress has continued to convene and adjourn since 1861, can anyone Show me the day, time, and record of this being changed since 1861? Draw your own conclusions.
  2. If the Congress was under the jurisdiction or control of the Executive Branch, how did the Judiciary operate? No matter how one looks at this, whether they choose to use the words Martial Law or not, this was not a normal constitutional Judiciary Branch. The president from the proclamation of 1861, called the military into service as the Commander in Chief, to suppress a rebellion, not to declare a war as only Congress could do. The military and/or military justice (rule by force) would replace the courts (rule by law). Therefore, it was an Executive Judiciary. If you prefer, call this an Extraordinary Occasion Judiciary. In Article 1 Section 9 of the Constitution it states in part – “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it…” Even though the Judiciary Branch has continued to operate since 1861 and specifically 1863 under the Conscription Act ever since, can anyone Show me the day, time, and record of this being changed since 1861 or 1863? Draw your own conclusions.
  3. On February 25, 1863, The National Bank Act became federal law. It established a “system” for a national security holding body for the existence of the monetary policy of the state. The Act, together with Abraham Lincoln’s issuance of “greenbacks,” raised money for the federal government in the American Civil War by enticing banks to buy federal bonds and taxing state bank issued currency out of existence. The law was later replaced by the National Bank Act of 1864 and other such laws, including the 16th Amendment to the Constitution (income tax) ever since. Can anyone Show me the day, time, and record of the control over OUR money being changed since 1863? Draw your own conclusions.
  4. In 1863, Congress passed the Conscription Act and it was signed into law by President Lincoln March 3rd, 1863. Not only did this law require people to be drafted into the military, but to enforce the law, it set up “districts” among all the northern states and when under control of the union army, all the southern states as well. While appearing constitutional among the states, in having representation in congress, the true power of enforcement was a provost-marshal of each “district.” No matter how one looks at this, whether they choose to think of or use the words Martial Law or not, this was not a normal constitutional representation of the several states. Therefore, these once sovereign and component states became Executive “district” states. If you prefer, call them Extraordinary Occasion States. Can anyone Show me the day, time, and record of the jurisdiction over “district” states being changed since 1863? Draw your own conclusions.
  5. General Orders No. 100 by President Lincoln, 24 April 1863, effectively put the entire country under Martial Law. It is specifically so named in SECTION I – “Martial LawMilitary jurisdictionMilitary necessityRetaliation.” Even though Martial Law was lifted after the war, southern states re-entered the union and habeas corpus was restored, can anyone Show me the day, time, and record of jurisdiction over “district” states, the Judiciary and Legislative Branch being restored to their original Constitutional authority? Or do all remain under the jurisdiction of the Executive Branch of government? Is our entire nation still an Extraordinary Occasion nation? Draw your own conclusions.
  6. On January 31, 1865, Congress passed the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, making it law that slavery or involuntary servitude “shall not exist.” Was this an Executive Extraordinary Occasion Congress or a Constitutional Congress? Can anyone Show me the day, time, and record of jurisdiction to enforce this law has not and is not still, residing under the jurisdiction of the Federal Government? Draw your own conclusions.
  7. December 6, 1865, the several states ratified the 13th Amendment of the Constitution, thereby making it part of, “the law of the land.” Was this “ratification” made by sovereign and component states or were they Extraordinary Occasion “district states” under the jurisdiction of the Federal Government? Can anyone Show me the day, time, and record that the emphatic words of this amendment, “any place subject to their jurisdiction,” meaning, the United States Federal Government, has ever been changed? Draw your own conclusions.
  8. On June 13, 1866, Congress passed the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Was this passed by a Constitutional Congress or an Executive Extraordinary Occasion Congress? Can anyone Show me the day, time, and record that the emphatic words of this amendment, “within its jurisdiction,” meaning the United States Federal Government, has ever been changed? Draw your own conclusions.
  9. On July 9th, 1868, the several states ratified the 14th Amendment, making it a part of the “law of the land,” the U.S. Constitution. Were these sovereign and component states or the Extraordinary Occasion “district” states of 1863?  Does this Amendment 14 Section 1, name a new class of citizenship? Can anyone Show me the day, time, and record that the emphatic words of this amendment, “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” referring to the citizens and their relationship to the jurisdiction of the United States Federal Government, has ever been changed? Draw your own conclusions.
  10. From the ratification February 3, 1870, with the 15th Amendment added to the U.S. Constitution, was this made a part of “the law of the land,” by sovereign and component states or Extraordinary Occasion “district” states? Can anyone Show me the day, time, and record that the emphatic words of this amendment, “citizens of the United States” Amendment 15 Section 1, referring to the citizens and their relationship to the jurisdiction of the United States Federal Government, has ever been changed? Draw your own conclusions.
  11. February 3, 1913, the several states ratified the 16th Amendment which allowed the Federal Government to collect income taxes “from whatever sources derived.” Can anyone Show me the day, time, and record that the necessary ¾ of the states actually ratified this law, as it is written, in the U.S. Constitution? Even if you could, were these states sovereign and component states or Extraordinary Occasion “district states? Draw your own conclusions.
  12. Amendments 17 – 27 from 1913 to 1992, to the U.S. Constitution, were these ratified by sovereign component states or Extraordinary Occasion “district” states? Please understand that I am not advocating the return of slavery or the denial of ‘the vote’ to all eligible citizens regardless of race, color, creed, sex or legal age. The questions are not to the intention of these amendments or even their effectiveness, but the jurisdiction; control over them and were they proposed by a Constitutional Congress or a Extraordinary Occasion Executive Congress, and were they ratified by Constitutional State Legislatures or Extraordinary Occasion, Executive State “district” Legislatures?
  13. Article 1 Section 8. U.S. Constitution in part reads: – “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States,…” This is obviously referring to what we know as, Washington D.C. or the “District” of Columbia. In 1871, the Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871. – CHAPTER 62, 1871 16 United States Statutes at Large 419 FORTY FIRST CONGRESS SESSION III . CHAPTER 62, 1871 CHAP. LXII. —“An act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States in Congress assembled, That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.” The original intent of the Constitution is that no state would have an unfair advantage or control of the seat of OUR united central government. Congress was given the exclusive control, to govern this “district,” the District of Columbia. Even as a “body corporate” it was not to be and is, not inconsistent with the Constitution. It is set up as a republic etc. It does have a constitution. Its physical boundaries are confined to 10 square miles. However, can anyone Show me the day, time, and record of items numbering 1 -12 above, have ever been changed since 1861? Therefore, this seat of government, this “District” of Columbia, Washington D.C., incorporates the Extraordinary Occasion “district” citizens, the Extraordinary Occasion “district” states, with exclusive control over both its “district” states and its “district” citizens by the Extraordinary Occasion Congress. The Extraordinary Occasion Congress and the Extraordinary Occasion Judiciary remain under the jurisdiction of the Extraordinary Occasion Executive Branch and ultimately with the president of the United States. This is the “system” of which I have referred to so often as, a corrupt, corrupting and corruptible “system.”  It is “legal fiction.” It is interpretation, legalese, legal speak and a mindset established under “extraordinary Occasions,” since 1861. Since 1861, it has continued to operate to the present-day.  As such, it is not inconsistent with the Constitution as it is set up as republic and a corporate form of government with a constitution. But it has “exclusive” jurisdiction, power and control over the entire country, and its people. OUR republic and OUR constitution, and OUR unalienable rights remain hidden under its veil of secrecy. It is not a person, persons or a party’s secrecy, but the secrecy or hidden self, of itself. This is not a conspiracy in that there is no single person, persons or a party to blame. It is what it is, a corrupt, corrupting and corruptible “system.” Most people under it cannot see this anymore than most people that operate it. All are “useful idiots” until all can see it, know how to tear it down and rip it out of OUR republic and DO IT which is to – RIP IT DOWN AND TEAR IT OUT! Can anyone Show me the day, time, and record of this being changed since 1861? Can anyone Show me that all the laws and even amendments to OUR Constitution since 1861, have ever been amended, rescinded, canceled or overturned since 1861? Can anyone Show me that these are not the facts and that they are not undisputed? Draw your own conclusions.

To those of US, WE the people that have long wondered or felt in OUR ‘gut’ and to those that now wonder or feel in their ‘gut’ that something is seriously wrong in OUR republic, can anyone Show me that it is not this corrupt, corrupting and corruptible “system” which explains it?

The bread on top of US, WE the People with all the almost innumerable causes and multiple directions, can anyone Show me that these do not divide US and even though good intentioned, prevent US from being united?

The bread on the bottom of US, WE the People with all its intricate tentacle like details; exclusive jurisdiction and control over US, WE the people, OUR Country, OUR States, OUR government, OUR republic and thus preventing the normal flow of OUR Constitution, controls it as well, can anyone Show me that it is not a corrupt, corrupting and corruptible “system”?

The jam in the middle of this sandwich is US, WE the People.

This sandwich is eating US, WE the People, you and me, OUR public servants, OUR nation, OUR, republic, OUR Constitution and the future security of OUR liberty; OUR unalienable rights and OUR posterity.

WE are being eaten alive!

Next Time: Purple Haze

Check out the other blogs listed to the right. Come often. Bring others. Get involved. Do something. See:

How You Can Help


Ask not what your country can do for you

or what you can do for your country,

but what can WE the People do, for each other!”


1 of WE,

Dahni
An Amer-I-Can eagle


Next Post – Purple Haze
Previous Post – WE the Jam
Front Page – Welcome & Introduction

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


%d bloggers like this: